Digital lending witnessed a sharp increase during the COVID-19
pandemic. Banks and Non-Banking Financial Companies
(NBFCs) have been lending either directly through their own
digital platforms or through a digital lending platform under an
outsourcing arrangement. Such outsourcing arrangements are
usually entered into with Lending Service Providers (LSP)/Digital
Lending Applications (DLAs).
Until recently, there were no set of regulations that governed the
‘digital lending’ business, which resulted in various concerns
such as unbridled engagement of third parties (LSPs), misselling, over indebtedness of customers, breach of data privacy,
unfair business conduct, exorbitant interest rates and unethical
recovery practices. Accordingly, on 2 September 2022, RBI
notified the guidelines on digital lending (the guidelines).
Applicability
The guidelines would be applicable to all Regulated Entities
(REs) (i.e., commercial banks, primary (urban) cooperative
banks, state co-operative banks, district central cooperative
banks and NBFCs (including housing finance companies))
providing loans through the digital lending platforms. The REs
would also need to ensure that the LSPs engaged by them, and
the digital lending apps of the REs and of the LSPs engaged by
the REs comply with the said guidelines.
Effective date
The guidelines are applicable on an immediate basis (i.e., from 2
September 2022) to:
-
The existing customers availing fresh loans and
-
To new customers getting onboarded
REs have been given time till 30 November 2022 to put in place
adequate systems and processes to ensure that existing digital
loans comply with the guidelines.
The guidelines reiterate that outsourcing arrangements entered into
by REs with the LSPs/DLAs do not diminish an REs’ obligations,
and it should continue to conform to the extant guidelines on
outsourcing prescribed by RBI. Additionally, it would be the REs’
responsibility to ensure that the guidelines are conformed with by
the LSPs and the DLAs.
The guidelines focus on three main areas:
-
Customer protection and conduct requirement
-
Technology and data requirement
-
Regulatory framework
The key takeaways under each of these areas is discussed below:
Key takeaways under the three main areas
-
Customer protection and conduct requirements: Some of
the important areas covered in the guidelines pertaining to
customer protection and conduct requirements include:
-
Loan disbursal, servicing and repayment directly
through RE account:
REs must ensure that all
disbursements are made to a bank account of the borrower
without any pass-through account/pool account of any third
party (including LSPs/DLAs)25, similarly all repayments
should be made by a borrower directly into the REs’ bank
account (and not a third party/pool account)
-
Enhanced disclosures to the borrowers:
REs should
make sure that various information such as key facts
statement, digitally signed documents, product-related
information, etc. is available to the borrowers
-
Fees/charges:
Fees, charges, etc. should be paid directly
by the RE to the LSP, and these should not be charged to
the borrower. Additionally, the penal interest should be
charged on the outstanding amount of the loan, and the
annual penal interest rate should be disclosed in the key
fact statement
-
Grievance redressal mechanism:
The responsibility of
grievance redressal would remain with the RE.
Additionally, various grievance redressal provisions have
been introduced which include having in place a suitable
nodal grievance redressal officer with the LSPs to deal with
digital lending related complaints/issues raised by the
borrowers, complaint mechanism under Reserve BankIntegrated Ombudsman Scheme (RB-IOS) etc.
-
Cooling-off/look-up period:
The guidelines have
introduced a cooling-off/look-up period, wherein
borrowers are given an option to exit digital loans by
paying the principal and proportionate Annual Percentage
Rate (APR)26 without any penalty. This period needs to
be determined by the board of directors of the RE,
however the minimum cooling-off period has been
prescribed by the guidelines.
-
Enhanced due diligence of LSPs and assessment of
borrower’s creditworthiness:
REs should conduct
enhanced due diligence before entering into a partnership
with an LSP, taking into account its technical abilities,
data privacy policies, storage systems, etc.
REs must also capture the economic profile of the borrowers
to assess the borrower’s creditworthiness in an auditable way
and also ensure that there is no automatic increase in the
credit limit, unless explicit consent of the borrower is taken on
record for such an increase.
-
Technology and data requirement: The key provisions
pertaining to technology and data requirement, as introduced
by the guidelines include the following:
-
Collection, usage and sharing of data with third
parties:
With regard to personal information of the
borrowers, the REs should ensure that only need-based
data is collected from borrowers, access to a borrowers’
mobile phone apps should be limited, borrower should be
able to manage his/her data collected by the DLA, purpose of
obtaining borrower’s consent should be disclosed, and
explicit consent of the borrower should be obtained before
sharing of personal information, etc.
-
Storage of data:
REs should establish and disclose clear
policy guidelines regarding storage of customer data- such as
type of data, length of time it can be stored, etc. REs should
also ensure that basic minimal data of the customer is stored
by it, no biometric data is stored, and all data is stored in
servers located within India.
-
Privacy policy and technology standards:
The REs should
ensure that the DLAs and LSPs engaged by them have a
comprehensive privacy policy, which is in compliance of the
applicable laws, associated regulations and RBI guidelines.
Additionally, REs should ensure that the REs and LSPs
engaged by them comply with various technology standards,
including requirements on cybersecurity.
-
Regulatory framework:
From a regulatory perspective, RBI
has prescribed the following requirements for digital lending:
-
Reporting to Credit Information Companies (CICs):
REs
should ensure that any lending done through their DLAs
and/or DLAs of LSPs engaged by them, is reported to Credit
Information Companies (CICs) irrespective of its
nature/tenure.
This will contribute towards reduced dependence on
alternative data for financial consumers, as more and more of
them would develop formal credit history for themselves
-
Provisions relating to loss sharing arrangement in case
of default:
Various LSPs provide certain credit enhancement
features such as first loss guarantee up to a pre-decided
percentage of loans generated by it. The guidelines issued
require the REs entering into financial contracts including a
clause on First Loss Default Guarantee (FLDG) to comply
with the Securitisation Guidelines, especially the provision
relating to synthetic securitisation27. Also, RBI, vide a press
release issued in August 2022 has stated that the
recommendation pertaining to FLDG is under examination
and further guidance is expected in near future.
-
Certain exceptions to this include disbursals covered exclusively under
statutory or regulatory mandate (of RBI or of any other regulator), flow of money
between REs for co-lending transactions and disbursals for specific end use,
provided the loans is disbursed directly into the bank.
-
APR is an effective annualised rate that is charged to a borrower of a digital
loan. It represents the all-inclusive cost- including cost of funds, credit cost,
operating cost processing fee, verification charges, maintenance charges, etc.
-
Synthetic securitisation is an arrangement where the credit risk of an
underlying pool of loan exposures is hedged by the originator through credit
derivatives or credit guarantee arrangements
To access the text of the guidelines, please click here
Action Points for Auditors
The guidelines issued by RBI have a significant impact on all
entities within the digital lending ecosystem. Various FinTech
entities that have partnered with banks and NBFCs would need to
reevaluate their business model. The guidelines could result in
mergers of certain FinTech entities, while it could require going
concern assessment for few. Auditors of FinTech entities should
discuss the impact of these guidelines with their clients and
determine the repercussions the guidelines would have on the
client’s business, and consequently on the financial statements.